Delay in Concluding Proceedings Per Se Can’t Be a Sole Ground to Quash Summoning Order | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 November, 2023
Case Details: Mukesh Kumar Tyagi v. Senior Intelligence Officer - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 131 (Uttarakhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ravindra Maithani, J.
- Rohit Arora & Lalit Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Shakshi Singh & Shobhit Saharia, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the assessee was summoned by GST Authority and he had already appeared before GST authority in response to a previous summons in 2020. It was contended that the authority was investigating matter for last more than two years and there was no need to summon again. It was also contended that the revenue was not discharging their duties efficiently and his right to life and liberty under Article 21 of Constitution of India was being violated.
The GST authority opposed the petition and contended that assessee was being summoned so as to tender statement and allegations were serious and needed to be further investigated.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the allegations against the assessee were pertaining to undue taking advantage or ITC by fake and fabricated documents and his anticipatory bail was also dismissed. Moreover, the delay in concluding proceedings per se is not a ground to quash summoning order unless there are other attending circumstances requiring Court’s interference. Thus, the Court held that the petition was liable to be dismissed as there was no reason for interference.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied