Date of receiving SCN & holidays to be excluded while computing 7 days period to give response u/s 148A: HC
- News|Blog|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 August, 2022
Case Details: Girdhar Gopal Dalmia v. Union of India - [2022] 141 taxmann.com 251 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- T. S. Sivagnanam & Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
- Ranjeet Kumar Murarka, Sr. Adv., Vivek Murarka and Debanath Dey for the Appellant.
- Soumen Bhattacharya for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The instant petition was filed by the assessee challenging the notice issued under section 148A(b) on the ground that adequate opportunity had not been granted to him. The assessee contended that the assessee wasn’t given adequate time to file reply even though the statute specifies that a minimum of 7 days should be granted to the assessee.
However, the Assessing Officer (AO) contended that the assessee was granted reasonable opportunity. It was submitted that not only the reply was given but enclosures had been uploaded including bank statements to show that the alleged remittances by the assessee were through proper banking channels.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the statute gives discretion to the AO to fix the notice period and such time limit has to be fixed bearing in mind the principles of natural justice that the assessee should be afforded a reasonable and adequate opportunity.
It should be noted that 17th March 2022 was declared as a State holiday on account of the Holi festival and 18th March 2022 (Friday) was also declared as a holiday and 19th March 2022 and 20th March 2022 being Saturday and Sunday, the next working day is 21st March 2022.
The assessee had received the show cause notice on 17th March 2022 online and the order was passed on 29th March 2022. Thus, the period of 7 clear days did not stand fulfilled in the case on hand.
For calculating the period of 7 days, the date of receiving notice online, i.e., 17th March 2022 had to be excluded. Apart from that, 18th March 2022, 19th March 2022, and 20th March 2022 were to be excluded since they were all holidays on account of Holi festival.
Considering all these factors, the assessee should be granted an opportunity of being heard and thus, the matter was to be remanded back to AO for fresh consideration.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- R.N. Fashion v. Union of India [2022] 139 taxmann.com 539 (Cal.) (para 3).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied