Corporate debtor can’t be allowed to alter financial status while application was pending u/s 10
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2021
Case details: Prithivraj Spinning Mill (P.) Ltd. v. Indian Overseas Bank, Coimbatore - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 384 (NCLT- Chennai )
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- R. Sucharitha, Judicial Member and B. Anil Kumar, Technical Member
- A.S. Sathish Kumar PCS for the Appellant.
- PCS, for the Appellant.
Facts of the Case
In the given case, the Applicant/corporate debtor filed an application under section 10 of the code to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in relation to it. However, the pending said application applicant filed an interim application stating that name of the applicant had been changed and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had approved a change of name by issuing a fresh certificate of incorporation.
In the said application, it was prayed to amend Form-VI which was filed by the applicant to give the effect of change of name and change of registered office. However, the application was not accompanied by amended Form-VI which is mandatory, and an amended copy of Form-VI was not filed to date.
In addition, the change in name of the corporate debtor and its registered office address, pending disposal of section 10 application by the applicant would lead to an irresistible conclusion that the application had been filed by Applicant Company with a malicious intention to defraud creditors.
NCLT Held
Since creditors would not be able to identify Applicant Company in its new avatar once the public announcement had been made in newspapers. The name of the company as mentioned in the application was not in existence on a date, hence, the Adjudicating Authority could not pass an order of CIRP, and thus, an instant application was to be dismissed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Marappan v. IOB [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1030-1031 of 2020, dated 3-12-2020] (para 13).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied