CIRP plea against corporate debtor admitted as there was sufficient reason for proving existence of debt
- News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 August, 2021
Case details: Varun Glass & Frit (P.) Ltd. v. Maruti Glaze Tiles (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 143 (NCLT - Ahd.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Madan B. Gosavi, Judicial Member and Virendra Kumar, Technical Member.
- Arjun Seth Ld. Counsel, for the Appellant.
- Alkesh Jalan, Ld. Pcs, for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The present application is filed under section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by Operational Creditor M/s Varun Glass & Frit Pvt. Ltd. to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Corporate Debtor M/s Maruti Glaze Tiles Private Limited for the default amount of Rs. 14,07,981/-including interest.
The operational creditor submitted that the operational creditor has supplied the ceramic Glaze to the corporate debtor and raised the invoices against the supplied goods, 14 invoices were raised by the operational creditor for the amount of Rs. 12,12,608/-. However, the corporate debtor made the payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- out of the said default amount. Even after several reminders and requests, he committed default.
Consequently, the operational creditor filed an instant petition to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the corporate debtor.
NCLT Held
The NCLT noted that the corporate debtor had not denied that the amount was not due and the invoices raised by the operational creditor were well within the limitation period. Thus, the instant petition was defect-free and complied with all relevant provisions of the Code and, therefore, the same was to be admitted.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Neeraj Jain v. Cloudwalker Streaming Technologies (P.) Ltd. [2020] 114 taxmann.com 589 (NCL-AT) (para 5)
- Manjeet Kaur Sran v. Tricolite Electrical Industries Ltd. [Co. Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 894 of 2019, dated 2-9-2019] (para 9).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied