Circular Issued by TRU is Set Aside as Power to Issue Instructions or Directions to Central Tax Officers is Vested Exclusively in CBIC | HC

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 20 November, 2023

Tax Research Unit; TRU

Case Details: Association of Technical Textiles Manufacturers and Processors v. Union of India - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 421 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Yashwant Varma & Dharmesh Sharma, JJ.
    • V. LakshmikumaranKunal Kapoor, Advs. for the Petitioner.
    • Shubhra ParasharVirendra Pratap Singh CharakYash Hari DixitPushpender Singh CharakJitendra Kumar TripathiAkash VajpaiShweta Shandilya, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioners includes association of technical textiles manufacturers and a member of the said association. The writ petition was filed to seek relief against Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST dated 31-12-2018, issued by the Tax Research Unit (TRU) regarding the classification of polypropylene woven and non-woven bags under the Customs Tariff Act.

The TRU clarified that polypropylene bags fall under Tariff Heading 3923. The petitioners argue that polypropylene non-woven fabric is a textile and bags should not be classified as plastics, but should be classified under Chapter 56 (Textiles and Textile Articles), specifically Tariff Heading 5603. The petitioners question the TRU’s authority to issue such clarifications, contending that only the CBIC has the power under Section 168 of the CGST Act to issue directives.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the TRU lacks the authority to issue the challenged clarification. The High Court further examined the classification issue and emphasized on the exclusion of textiles from Chapter 39. However, the court refrains from giving a definitive opinion on the classification issue due to inadequate material and industry-wide ramifications. It stresses the importance of avoiding classification rulings based on tenuous and inadequate material. The court quashes the impugned circular and leaves the issue of classification open for consideration by the competent authority in appropriate proceedings.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied