CBIC guidelines on blocking of credit under Rule 86A vide Circular No.04/2021

  • Blog|GST & Customs|
  • 4 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 7 January, 2022

blocking of GST credit under Rule 86A

Introduction

The Government has introduced Rule 86A to block ineligible or fraudulently availed ITC by the taxpayers vide Notification No. 75/2019 dated 26.12.2019. As per this Rule, the Commissioner or any officer authorized by him can block the ITC available in the electronic credit ledger of the taxpayer if he has ‘reasons to believe’ that he has fraudulently availed ITC. This Rule was inserted to curb the malpractice of fake invoicing without actual supply of goods. 

Blocking of Credit – Rule 86A of CGST Rules

Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017 empowers the Commissioner or its authorized officers to disallow debit of electronic credit ledger and block the credit based on a reasonable belief that credit of input tax available in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible. It is clear that there must be “reasons to believe” that credit of input tax available in the electronic credit ledger is either ineligible or has been fraudulently availed by the registered person before disallowing the debit of amount from the electronic credit ledger of the said registered person.

Gujarat High Court’s Take on Rule 86A

In the case of S.S. Industries v. UOI [2020] 122 taxmann.com 296 (Guj.), the honourable Gujarat High Court has held that the Rule 86A casts an obligation upon the authority concerned to form an opinion but is silent with regard to the passing of any specific order assigning prima facie reasons for invoking Rule 86A. To this extent, the Government needs to look into the matter, issue appropriate guidelines and lay down some procedures to be followed to exercise power under Rule 86A of the Rules. The High Court also observed that Rule 86A of the CGST Rules should not be used as a tool to harass the taxpayers.

CBIC Guidelines

Now, CBIC has issued detailed guidelines for the officers to exercise the powers of Rule 86A. In these guidelines, the CBIC has clarified grounds for disallowing debit of an amount from electronic credit ledger, proper authority for the purpose of Rule 86A, the procedure for disallowing debit of electronic credit ledger or blocking credit under Rule 86A etc.

Grounds for Invoking Rule 86A for Blocking of Credit

The reasons for such belief must be based only on one or more of the following grounds:

    1. The registered person avails the credit on the invoices or debit notes issued by a supplier, who is found to be non-existent or is found not to be conducting any business from the place declared in registration.
    2. The registered person avails the credit on invoices or debit notes without actually receiving any goods or services or both.
    3. The registered person avails the credit on invoices or debit notes, the tax in respect of which has not been paid to the government.
    4. The registered person claiming the credit is found to be non-existent or is found not to be conducting any business from the place declared in registration.
    5. The registered person avails the credit without having any invoice or debit note or other valid documents.

The Commissioner, or an officer authorized by him, not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, must have reasons to believe that ITC availed is ineligible or availed fraudulently and have material evidence for disallowing debit of an amount from ECL, only after proper consideration of all the grounds mentioned above.

Proper authority for the purpose of Rule 86A

The Commissioner/Principal Commissioner may authorize the exercise of powers for disallowing the debit amount from ECL under Rule 86A based on the following monetary limits as mentioned below:

Total amount of ineligible or fraudulently availed input tax credit Officer to disallow debit of amount from electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A
Not exceeding Rupees 1 crore Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner
Above Rupees 1 crore but not exceeding Rs. 5 crore Additional Commissioner/Joint Commissioner
Above Rs. 5 crore Principal Commissioner/Commissioner

If during the course of Audit under section 65 or 66 of CGST Act, 2017, it is noticed that any input tax credit has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible as per the grounds mentioned in Rule 86A, which may require disallowing debit of electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A, the concerned Commissioner/ Principal Commissioner of CGST Audit Commissione rate may refer the same to the jurisdictional CGST Commissioner to examine the matter for the exercise of power under Rule 86A.

Procedure for disallowing debit of electronic credit ledger/blocking credit under Rule 86(A)

The Commissioner or the officer authorized must have reason to believe that the input tax credit availed by the registered person has either been fraudulently availed or is ineligible, as per conditions/grounds based on material evidence available and found it necessary to protect the interests of revenue by disallowing debit of electronic credit ledger of the said person. Such “Reasons to believe” shall be duly recorded by the concerned officer in writing on file before he proceeds to disallow debit of amount from electronic credit ledger of the said person.

The amount disallowed for debit from electronic credit ledger should not be more than the amount of input tax credit which is believed to have been fraudulently availed or is ineligible, as per the conditions/grounds mentioned above. The action by the Commissioner or the authorized officer to disallow debit from the electronic credit ledger of a registered person is informed on the portal to the concerned registered person, along with the details of the officer who has disallowed such debit.

Allowing debit of disallowed/restricted credit under Rule 86A

The Commissioner or the authorized officer may, on his own or based on submission of the assessee may examine the matter afresh. After being satisfied that the ITC availed initially considered being fraudulently or ineligible, it is no more ineligible or wrongly availed. He may allow the use of the ITC, so disallowed/restricted, to the extent of eligibility. However, the reasons for allowing the debit of ECL, earlier disallowed, shall be duly recorded on file in writing before allowing debit of electronic credit ledger. Moreover, the restriction is only for one year and shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of imposing such restriction.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

2 thoughts on “CBIC guidelines on blocking of credit under Rule 86A vide Circular No.04/2021”

  1. how the taxpayer will check wether the adress mentioned in supplier’s bill is declared in his GST registration or not because now a days additional palce of business declared in GST registration is not displayed when checked on line it is avaialble only when we login in GSt portal if supplier which is not possible in all cases

    1. If it is not coming online portal, you can ask the vendor/customer to provide the copy of Registration Certificate. That would provide the details of additional place of business.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied