CBDT specifies manner for constitution of collegium to decide deferment of appeals u/s 158AB
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 September, 2022
Order F.no. 370133/13/2022-TPL, dated 28-09-2022
The Finance Act, 2022 inserted a new section 158AB to avoid duplicity of appeal before judicial forums. Said section provides that in a case of an assessee wherein the question of law arising from an order of Commissioner (Appeals) or the ITAT for a particular assessment year is identical to a question of law that is pending before jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court in:
(a) assessee’s own case for any other assessment year; or
(b) any other assessee’s case for any assessment year,
Then, the assessing officer shall not file an appeal before the jurisdictional High Court or the ITAT. The Assessing Officer shall instead file an application to the jurisdictional High Court or the ITAT that the appeal on the question of law in the assessee’s case may be filed when the decision on such question of law, in the other case, becomes final.
To decide whether the question of law is identical or not, the provision entrusts the same to the collegium, which shall comprise two or more Chief Commissioners or Principal Commissioners or Commissioners, as may be specified by the Board.
To decide on deferment of appeals, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has specified that a Collegium shall be constituted by:
(a) Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax Transfer Pricing (International Tax and Transfer Pricing) for appeals in jurisdiction related to International Taxation and Transfer Pricing;
(b) Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) for appeals in jurisdiction related to Exemption Charge;
(c) Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) or DGIT (Inv) for appeals in jurisdiction related to Central Charge; and
(d) Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (CCA) for appeals in the jurisdiction in all other cases.
Further, the Collegium shall comprise three members who are officers of the rank of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) or Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT).
Click Here To Read The Full Order
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied