Cancellation order not sustainable due to cryptic in nature & passed without personal hearing: HC

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 3 January, 2023

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Interim Moratorium Barred Continuation of Proceedings u/s 138 of NI Act Against Petitioner Due to IBC’s Overriding Effect | HC

News, Blog, FEMA & Banking

Borrower’s Right to Redeem Secured Asset Ends on Publication of Notice u/s 9(1) of SI Rules, Not After Sale Completion | SC

Latest from Taxmann

Cancellation of GST registration

Case Details: Mahendra Junabhai Zala v. Office of Deputy Commissioner, State Tax - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 651 (Gujarat)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ms Sonia Gokani & Mrs Mauna M. Bhatt, Jj.
    • Yogini V. Parikh & Ms Noopur V. Parikh for the Petitioner.
    • Ms Pooja Ashar for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

A show cause notice (SCN) was issued against the petitioner for cancellation of registration and consequential order confirming such cancellation was passed. He filed appeal against order after four years from date of issuance of order and same was rejected as time barred. Thereafter, he filed writ petition against the cancellation of registration and contended that order and SCN were cryptic in nature.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner has deposited sum of Rs.37,43,714/- as tax and the interest amount during the relevant period which is lying in the cash ledger. The Court also noted the contention of petitioner that returns were not filed due to negligence and death of accountant and he was not aware of SCN uploaded by department as same was not reflected in portal. Therefore, it was held that impugned order was passed without providing opportunity of personal hearing to petitioner which was in violation of principle of natural justice. Thus, the instant writ petition was maintainable and the Court also directed department to restore registration of petitioner.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied