Can FDRs kept with bank be treated as asset of Corporate Debtor?

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 5 March, 2022

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Income Tax

No TDS on Payments to Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for MSEs Referred in Section 10(46B) | CBDT

Blog

Assessee to Pursue Pending Proceedings Before Appellate Authority Instead of Filing Writ Petition | HC

Latest from Taxmann

Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) and Deposit

Case Details: Monitoring Agency of Anush Finlease & Construction (P.) Ltd. v. State Bank of India - [2022] 135 taxmann.com 251 (NCLAT- New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Anant Bijay Singh, Judicial Member and MS. Shreesha Meria, Technical Member.
    • Ashish Verma and Iswar Mohapatra, Advs. for the Appellant. 
    • Apoorv Sarvaria and RP Vats, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, pursuant to an application filed under section 7, CIRP had been initiated against the corporate debtor and the resolution plan approved by CoC had been approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Prior to insolvency resolution, the corporate debtor had obtained authorisation for 40 export promotion capital goods from the Additional Directorate General of Foreign Trade.

The Corporate debtor maintained Fixed Deposit receipts (FDR’s) with respondent banks against authorisation and licence. Said FDRs were being maintained against bank guarantees issued by the corporate debtor.

The appellant monitoring agency of the corporate debtor requested respondents to release said FDRs but they failed to comply.

Being aggrieved, the appellant filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority but the same was dismissed.

NCLAT Held

On appeal, the NCLAT observed that as per RBI Guidelines and various judgments in this regard margin money is construed as a substratum of a trust created to pay to the beneficiary to whom bank guarantee is given and cannot be treated as an asset of the corporate debtor. Therefore, Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the application of the applicant.

Case Review

    • Phoenix ARC (P.) Ltd. v. Anush Finlease & Construction (P.) Ltd. [2022] 135 taxmann.com 250 (NCLT – New Delhi) (para 35) affirmed [See Annex].

List of Cases Referred to

Check out Taxmann's Live Webinar with CPC Income-Tax!

The 'One-of-a-Kind' – CPC Roundtable

Presentation | Interaction | Brain Storming

🗓️ 9th March 2022 (Wednesday) | 🕒 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (IST)

👩‍💻👨‍💻 Register Now for FREE! (Limited Slots Available): https://taxmann.social/HxkX

💬 ASK from CPC

You can also raise your concern(s)/suggestion(s) with CPC regarding Registration, E-filing, Processing, Refund and Rectification related issues. CPC officers will take up the issues during the live event.

Coverage of the Webinar & the Speakers:

✔️ Welcome Address & Moderator| Mukesh Patel | International Tax Expert

✔️ Keynote Address | Dr Sibichen Mathew | Director of Income-tax | CPC-ITR

CPC Roundtable

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied