Calcutta HC Quashed Order Passed By Dept. Without Formally Rejecting Extension Request of Assessee
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 March, 2024
Case Details: Anurag Garodia v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 144 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.
- Ankit Kanodia, Ms Megha Agarwal & Jitesh Sah for the Petitioner.
- Anirban Ray, T.M. Siddique, Tanoy Chakraborty & Saptak Sanyal for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, a show-cause under Section 73(1) had been issued to petitioner. It didn’t file reply due to reasons of Durga Puja as it could not appropriately prepare its response. Therefore, it had applied for extension and sought for personal hearing. But the department passed order by ignoring the petitioner’s request. It filed writ petition against the demand order.
High Court Held
The Honorable high Court noted that as per proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 75, revenue can grant up to three extensions, but in instant case, revenue without formally rejecting petitioner’s application for extension, had passed the impugned order. The Court also noted that once petitioner had sought for an extension, revenue was obliged to consider application for extension and ought not to have passed the final order without appropriately considering petitioner’s application for extension.
Therefore, The Court held that the impugned order would stand vitiated on ground of violation of principles of natural justice and could not be sustained.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied