Bombay HC denied indefinite stay where taxpayer was given substantial time to reach Settlement Commission
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 June, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Mehta Infocomm v.Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate of Revenue intelligence* - [2022] 138 taxmann.com 568 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dipankar Datta, CJ. & Milind N. Jadhav, J.
- Devesh Tripathi, Pankti Shah & Krishnaprasad Mundayoor for the Applicant.
- Jitendra B. Mishra & Dhananjay B. Deshmukh for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Petitioner was engaged in the import of Set Top Boxes (STB) embedded with Conditional Access Systems (CAS) either imported directly or purchased on the high sea sale basis.
An investigation was conducted by the department and a common show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on March 27, 2019, on the ground of non-declaration of the licence fee paid/payable to the CAS provider, suppression of actual value of STB unit, fabrication of invoices, etc.
The petitioner informed the Department on July 25, 2019 that a show cause notice on a similar issue was received from the Settlement Commission and the Petitioner was desirous of filing a consolidated application before the Settlement Commission.
The Petitioner later on requested for the adjournment of the hearing to enable them to approach the Settlement Commission, multiple times. The Petitioner further emailed the Department on March 11, 2020, for seeking more time to file the application before the Settlement Commission.
However, the Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai passed the Order-in-Original holding that the Petitioner were liable for the payment of differential duty, penalty and interest.
The petitioners challenged the said Order-in-Original contending that the order is passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice as the adjudicating authority was being informed about the intent of the Petitioners to approach the Settlement Commission.
High Court Held
The Bombay High Court observed that the Adjudicating Authority passed the order in the stipulated period of time as mandated under section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962, which would have otherwise rendered show cause notices as null and void and the petitioners were not prevented from approaching the Settlement Commission during the substantial time granted. Thereby, the High Court dismissed the petition.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Thirumurugan Enterprises v. Addl. CCE [W.P. No. 11114 of 2015, dated 17-4-2015] (para 8.5) – distinguished.
List of Cases Referred
-
- Thirumurugan Enterprises v. Addl. CCE [W.P. No. 11114 of 2015, dated 17-4-2015] (para 8.5).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
