Bank officer who was conferred power of attorney to initiate CIRP can file petition u/s 7 against corporate debtor: NCLT
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 September, 2021
Case Details: Punjab National Bank v. Telstar Industries (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 130 taxmann.com 240 (NCLT - Ahd.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Madan B. Gosavi, Judicial Member and Virendra Kumar Gupta, Technical Member
- Ketan M. Parikh, Ld. Counsel, for the Petitioner.
- Sandip Bhatt, Ld. Counsel, for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the Financial creditor bank had a sanctioned loan to the corporate debtor. The Corporate debtor committed default in repayment of the loan. The Bank filed an instant application to initiate the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. The Corporate debtor raised a dispute that the bank officer i.e, ‘Swapnil’, who had filed instant application, was not duly authorized to file the same. The Corporate debtor also raised a dispute that the application to initiate CIRP was barred by the limitation. The Tribunal noted that by way of a general power of attorney, ‘Swapnil’ had been properly authorized to file the instant application on behalf of the bank under section 7. Thus, an instant CIRP application was to be admitted.
NCLT Held
With regard to the question of time-barred application, the NCLT noted that by way of one-time settlement firstly in 2015 and thereafter in 2016 the corporate debtor had acknowledged the debt. Thus, the instant application filed in 2019 was within a limitation period of three years and thus, the same was to be admitted.
List of Cases Referred To
-
- B.K. Education of Services (P.) Ltd. v. Prag Gupta & Associates [2018] 98 taxmann.com 213/150 SCL 293 (SC)
- Sesh Nath Singh v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-operative Bank Ltd. [2021] 125 taxmann.com 357 (SC)
- Kishanlal Likmichand Bothra v. Canara Bank [Co. Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 704 of 2020, dated 24-3-2021].
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied