Bank Can’t Claim Shortfall u/s 36(1)(viia) While Receiving Sum from Govt. After Loan Waiver | ITAT
- News|Blog|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 July, 2023
Case Details: Virudhunagar District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. PCIT - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 61 (Chennai-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Mahavir Singh, Vice President & Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Accountant Member
- K. Manoj Menon, Adv. & K. Chindan, (Adv.) Ld. AR’s for the Appellant.
- R. Mohan Reddy (CIT) – Ld. DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-bank provided loans to certain customers, which Government waived off. The amount so waived off was to be received from Government. However, there was a shortfall between the amount claimed and reimbursed to the assessee. Thus, the assessee claimed deduction under section 36(1)(viia) with respect to reserve for short provision for waiver of loans.
The Assessing Officer (AO) duly allowed the claim of the assessee. However, the Principal Commissioner (PCIT) invoked revisionary proceedings on the ground that the Government could not be treated as a doubtful debtor.
The matter reached before the Chennai Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that the Government could not be held to be a doubtful debtor. Consequently, the provision so made could not be considered a provision under section 36(1)(viia). Even as per the assessee’s submissions, this provision has been reversed in subsequent years and offered to tax.
Assessing Officer failed to consider this aspect while framing assessment. Therefore, the order for revision was affirmed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Virudhunagar District Central Co-opreative Bank Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [IT Appeal Nos. 287 to 291(Chny.) of 2018, dated 4-7-2018] (para 3.1)
- Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2012] 26 taxmann.com 330/139 ITD 154 (Chennai) (para 3.6)
- Dy. CIT v. Nawanshahar Central Corporative Bank Ltd. 2018 SCC Online ITAT 4037 (para 3.6)
- Dy. CIT v. Hoshiarpur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. 2019 SCC Online ITAT 24588 (para 3.6).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied