Authority issuing notice of suspension is bound to pass final order of cancellation of registration
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 July, 2021
Case details: Avon Udhyog v. State of Rajasthan - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 122 (Rajasthan)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dinesh Mehta, J.
- Sharad Kothari for the Petitioner.
- Hemant Dutt for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
A search has been conducted on petitioner’s premises and subsequently, the notice of cancellation of registration is issued to the petitioner. The petitioner has furnished his detailed reply beyond the time limit of 7 days prescribed under sub-rule (1) of Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The authorities have not pass any final order regarding petitioner’s registration, due to which petitioner’s right to trade has been kept suspended.
The petitioner submitted that either a reasonable opportunity of hearing must be granted to an assessee before suspending the registration or the Assessing Authority is required to take a final decision pursuant to notice of cancellation of registration.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court stated that suspension of registration has its own consequences & it brings the entire business to a standstill. In a way it is worse than cancellation. Against cancellation, an assessee can take legal remedies but against suspension pending an enquiry, even if the assessee chooses to take remedies, the authorities or the Court(s) would normally show reluctance.
It was held that the proceedings of cancellation of registration cannot be kept hanging fire on any pretext, including where the assessee failed to file reply within the time allowed. The Authority issuing the notice is statutorily bound to pass order in terms of sub-rule (3) of Rule 22 (Supra).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied