Auction purchaser was to be relieved from auction process as property was not free from encumbrance

  • Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 26 July, 2021

Enforcement of Security Interest

Case details: Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. v. Mahansaria Industrial Ventures (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 210 (SC)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ.
    • P.S. Narasimha, Sr. Adv., Rajesh Kumar-I, AOR, V.K. Sachdeva, Adv., Ms. Aditi Tripathi, Adv. and Nipun Sharma, Adv. for the Petitioner.
    • K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv, Udit Mendiratta, Adv. R. Sudhinder, Adv., Ms. Ekta Bhasin, Adv. and Ashok Mathur, AOR for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, land belonging to borrower company ‘JCT’ was secured asset with various lenders, the interest of those lenders was acquired by the appellant-reconstruction company, which then issued a notice under section 13(2) to borrower company.

The Appellant issued an auction notice for the sale of said land. Subsequently, the auction was conducted wherein the respondent emerged as a successful bidder. However, in other proceedings, a petition for winding up of borrower company was admitted and an Official Liquidator was appointed.

High Court Held

During the proceeding, the Gujarat State Sales Tax Department filed a claim of Rs. 268.28 crores before Official Liquidator wherein it contended that it had an overriding charge on the property. However, the High Court by the impugned order held that respondent-successful bidder was a third party and was interested in purchasing land which was free from all encumbrances and it would not bid for said land had he known that State itself was laying claim over it. Thus, the auction purchaser was to be relieved from the auction process and was entitled to receive a refund of part sale consideration made by it to the appellant.

Case Review

    • Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. v. Mahansaria Industrial Ventures (P.) Ltd. [2021] 128 taxmann.com 209 (Punj. & Har.) (para 1) SLP dismissed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied