Assessment order passed without hearing opportunity to be quashed for violating principles of natural justice: HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 March, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Sendhil Kumar v. State Tax Officer - [2023] 148 taxmann.com 394 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Abdul Quddhose, J.
- N. Murali for the Petitioner.
- Ms Amirtha Dinakaran, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner filed writ petition to challenge the assessment order issued by the Adjudicating Authority on the ground that no personal hearing was afforded to the petitioner in the impugned assessment proceedings. It was contended that as per Section 75 (4) of the CGST Act, 2017, personal hearing ought to have been afforded to the petitioner since an adverse decision had been taken by the Authority.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that Section 75 (4) of CGST Act, 2017 specifically requires grant of hearing opportunity where adverse decision contemplated against assessee. In the instant case, the impugned order imposed tax liability as well as penalty on the petitioner. However, no personal hearing was afforded to petitioner in impugned assessment proceedings.
Therefore, it was held that the impugned assessment order was to be quashed on ground of violation of principles of natural justice and matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
