Assessee is Duty Bound to Respond to Notices, Appear & Offer Explanations Before AO | HC Refuses to Halt Proceedings
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 December, 2023
Case Details: T. M. Subash Thangam v. ITO - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 732 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr Anita Sumanth, J.
- A. Ilayaperumal for the Petitioner.
- Dr B. Ramaswamy for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee filed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The prayer of assessee was to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to drop all proceedings initiated against him based on the notices issued under provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the Financial Years of 2017-2018 to 2020-2021.
High Court Held
The Madras High Court held that the prayer made by the assessee appeared to be misconceived. The affidavit shows the petitioner received notice and an order under Section 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Act, dated 23.03.2022 and 05.04.2022. It’s unclear if these proceedings cover all the financial years mentioned in the prayer, as the notice and order only cover some years.
Further, the assessee is also unclear whether any assessment order was passed for the periods in question.
Even if it appears that the assessee received orders under Section 148A(d) that have attained finality and was also in receipt of notices under Section 148 of the Act, it is for it to cooperate with the proceedings initiated by the Department and take matters to a logical conclusion, in accordance with the law.
Revenue also contended that notices were issued continuously and repeatedly to the assessee, but there had been no response from his side. It was incumbent on the part of the assessee to appear before AO and put forth any explanation that he may have in regard to the issues raised by the Department.
Accordingly, mandamus of the nature sought by the assessee cannot be granted in a case that involves an appreciation of various disputed facts. It is to be noted that in matters relating to assessment, filing of a representation is of no avail as the assessee is duty-bound to respond to notices, appear before the officer and offer explanations.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied