Application for Revocation of Cancellation Could Not Be Delayed by Dept. Seeking Reconciliation of Discrepancy in ITC | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 December, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Cuthbert Winner LLP v. Assistant Commissioner of CGST - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 505 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
- Aditya Kaumar, Tarun Chawla, Pravesh Bahuguna & Ms Priyanka Chawla, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel, Ms Suhani Mathur & Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the assessee had made an application to reflect change of its principal place of business in GST records. After submission of the said application, the proper officer issued a notice demanding proof of new address and in the meanwhile, certain officers of DRI visited assessee’s previous place of business and found that assessee was not present at said premises. Thereafter, assessee’s application was rejected and assessee’s registration was suspended on ground that it was found to be non-existent at its registered address.
It applied for revocation of cancellation order and furnished information regarding change of its principal place of business but the proper officer had issued a further communication seeking reconciliation of difference between ITC claimed and ITC available in GSTR-2A. It filed writ petition against the demand of further information and not deciding revocation application till date.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the discrepancy in credit claimed by assessee was not ground on which assessee’s GST registration was cancelled. Therefore, the Court held that the proper officer should decide assessee’s application for revocation of cancellation order after examining all aspects as to whether assessee was existent at its principal place of business at material time.
The Court also directed that GST registration would be restored if the proper officer will find that the assessee was existent at its principal place of business prior to applying for change of address.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
