Applicant-Bank can’t file intervene plea before NCLAT if it isn’t a party to proceedings before NCLT: NCLAT
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 July, 2021
Case details: State Bank of India v. Limtex Tea & Industries Ltd. - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 326 (NCLAT- New Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Anant Bijay Singh | Judicial Member and Ms. Shreesha Merla | Technical Member.
- Abhijeet Sinha, CS, Suhita Mukhopadhyay, Avirup Chaterjee and Saikat Sarkar, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Shantanu Parashar and Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was filed by the financial creditor against the corporate debtor. However, the NCLT by order dismissed the application and released the corporate debtor from the rigour of ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and directed Interim Resolution Professional/Resolution Professional to hand over records and assets of the ‘corporate debtor’ to the director of ‘corporate debtor’ immediately.
Thereafter, the Applicant bank submitted that during ongoing CIRP, defaults had been committed by corporate debtor in repayment of financial facilities availed from applicant bank, thus it had taken symbolic possession of land leased to the appellant.
Since the said land did not fall under the category of ‘assets of corporate debtor’ and the same be returned to applicant bank and not to the corporate debtor.
NCLAT Held
However, the NCLAT found that the applicant was not a party in proceedings before Tribunal and had the first time brought these new facts before Appellate Tribunal through intervention application, which could not be permitted, therefore, an instant application was to be dismissed as not maintainable.
Case Review
-
- Limtex Tea & Industries Ltd. v. Shri Bihariji Cold Rollers (P.) Ltd. [2021] 128 taxmann.com 325 (NCLT – Kol.) affirmed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied