AO to Record Reasons for Carrying Out Reassessment Even in Case of an Ex-parte Proceedings | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 November, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: GSP Piling Constructions Private Limited & anr. vs. ACIT - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 665
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- T. S. Sivagnanam, CJ. & Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
- R.N. Dutt, Ms Sutapa Roy Chowdhury & Ms Aratrika Roy for the Appellant.
- Vipul Kundalia, Prithu Dudhoria & Anurag Roy for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
For the relevant assessment year, a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act was issued to which the assessee did not reply despite three adjournments being granted. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) passed the final assessment order under section 147.
The assessee filed a writ petition against the order passed under Section 148A(d) and the final assessment order contending to be a non-speaking order.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the assessee is partly to be blamed for not giving a reply to the show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b) despite three adjournments being granted. Nevertheless, while affirming the proposal in the show cause notice, the authorities are expected to record reasons, at least brief reasons, and if not brief, why the proposal in the show cause notice is to be confirmed despite the assessee submitting the reply.
The reading of the order gives an impression that on account of assessee’s default in not submitting the reply to the show cause notice, it was a fit case to issue notice under Section 148. However, even in ex parte proceedings, the authority has to record reasons for concluding why the case has been taken out to reopen the assessment.
Accordingly, the Court directed the proceedings to be re-done with the matter by giving the assessee a fresh opportunity to submit a reply to the show cause notice under Section 148A(b).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
