AO rightfully rejected the claim that CIRP proceeding could be a ground to file a belated claim: NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 7 February, 2022

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

NCLT Rejected Re-Filing of Insolvency Petition by FC, as AA Did Not Allow Re-Filing Post-Settlement Failure

Blog, News, FEMA & Banking

ED Couldn’t Deny NOCs for Remitting Funds Abroad Based on Mere FEMA Summons; Clear Proof of Contravention Was Required | HC

Latest from Taxmann

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 - Corporate liquidation process - Appeal against decision of liquidator

Case Details: Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. Right Engineers & Equipment India (P.) Ltd. (in liquidation) - [2022] 134 taxmann.com 179 (NCLAT - Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Detail

    • M. Venugopal, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member
    • Sandeep Huilgol, Adv. for the Appellant.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the Adjudicating Authority had passed an order directing the initiation of liquidation proceeding against the respondent (corporate debtor). The public announcement was issued by Liquidator on 11-2-2020 announcing the liquidation of the corporate debtor as per which the last date of submission of claim was on 11-1-2021.

Appellant passed reassessment order in terms of Karnataka Value Added Tax by which corporate debtor was liable to pay tax interest and penalty. On 4-3-2021, the statement of claim was filed by the appellant before the Liquidator covering the dues payable by the corporate debtor to the appellant. The Liquidator rejected the claim for the reason that it was filed belatedly.

Appellant applied section 42 before NCLT sought to set aside order passed by Liquidator. Appellant also sought condonation of delay of 52 days for submission of claim before the Liquidator.

Adjudicating Authority by impugned order dismissed the application on the ground that the reasons mentioned for condonation of delay that appellant was unaware of CIRP of the corporate debtor were untenable and that CIRP is the time-bound manner and it cannot be put on hold continuously on receiving belated claims.

NCLAT Held

NCLAT held that it couldn’t be forgotten that the Liquidator by adverting to regulation 16(A) of Regulations, 2016 (Liquidation Process) had rejected the claim through his letter on 17-3-2021 mentioning that the claims required to be furnished on or before 11-1-2021.

The Appellant had submitted its claim only on 4-3-2021 and to come out with the reason that the appellant was not aware of the CIRP and liquidation process of the corporate debtor are unworthy of acceptance and the said reason was rightly rejected by the Adjudicating Authority. Thus, the appeal was dismissed by NCLAT.

Case Review

List of Cases Referred to

    • N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy [1998] 7 SCC 123 (para 8).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied