AO Can’t Make Additions Merely Based on Form 26AS Without Verifying Total Contract Amount & Bills | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 August, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: PCIT v. MBC Infra Space (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 108 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vipul M. Pancholi & Devan M. Desai, JJ.
-
Mrs. Kalpanak Raval for the Appellant.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-company had filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. Thereafter, assessment under section 143(3) was completed, and additions were made to the assessee’s income on account of the difference in payment received as per Form 26AS and as per books of account.
On appeal, the CIT(A) deleted the additions made by AO, and the Tribunal confirmed further such deletion. Aggreived-AO filed an appeal before the Gujarat High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the AO had not verified the assessee’s claim. The assessee raised RA Bills of Rs. 8.32 crore during the relevant financial year. The assessee received an amount of Rs. 8.32 crores, out of which, as per the books of account, as per the bank statement, is of Rs. 7.7 crores only, which was received in the current year.
There was a double deduction of TDS on the same project, which was entered into with the two different parties at the time of the bill raised and at the time of payment made on certain bills.
Thus, the CIT(A) has rightly deleted the addition after verification of the bank account contract amount, which the assessee received based on running bills. Thus, after considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the appeal preferred by the AO was liable to be dismissed.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Dy. CIT v. MBC Infra Space (P.) Ltd. [IT Appeal No. 675 (SRT.) of 2018, dated 1-3-2022] (para 11) affirmed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
