[Analysis] Corporate Exit Made Easy | IBBI Takes Progressive Steps Towards Transparent Voluntary Liquidations
- Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 5 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 16 February, 2024
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Amendment to Regulation 3; Disclosure of pendency proceedings or assessment by way of affidavit
- Amendment to Regulation 37; Change in the timeline of conducting the contributories’ meeting
- Amendment in Regulation 39; prescribes the detailed norms w.r.t claiming of amount deposited into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account by the stakeholders
- Conclusion
1. Introduction
Earlier, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) on 05th October, 2023 had floated a discussion Paper for streamlining the voluntary liquidation process. Many amendments were proposed in the discussion paper including (a) Disclosure of any pending proceedings or litigation before statutory authorities by director of the corporate person, (b) Establishing a mechanism for timely reporting reasons for delay in the liquidation process, (c) mandatory declaration by a corporate person falling under the category of Financial Service Provider (FSP) etc. Many proposals are accepted and accordingly, the board has notified the amendment in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Voluntary Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2024. The key amendments are discussed in detail below:
2. Amendment to Regulation 3; Disclosure of pendency proceedings or assessment by way of affidavit
Regulation 3 of the IBBI (Voluntary Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017 prescribes the conditions for liquidation proceedings of a corporate person. Currently, the following declarations are required from the majority of directors verified by an affidavit:
- they have made a full inquiry into the affairs of the corporate person and they have formed an opinion that either the corporate person has no debt or that it will be able to pay its debts in full from the proceeds of assets to be sold in the liquidation
- the corporate person is not being liquidated to defraud any person
As per the amended norms, the director is required to submit the disclosure about pending proceedings or assessments before statutory authorities, and pending litigations, in respect of the corporate person (clause b(iii))
Further, the director shall also verify by an affidavit that the corporate person has made sufficient provision to meet the obligations arising on account of pending matters mentioned in sub-clause (iii) of clause (b).
Intend behind the amendment
The Board noticed that as of August 31, 2023, around 55% of the ongoing cases had been continuing for more than one year. Further, the Board observed that the delay is generally on account of delay in making foreign remittances, pending appeal regarding demand/ penalty imposed and refund from statutory departments and other litigations. Disclosing the pending proceedings or assessments by the directors will reduce the prolonged liquidation process, ensuring timely compliance, improving efficiency and enhancing transparency in the liquidation process.
3. Amendment to Regulation 37; Change in the timeline of conducting the contributories’ meeting
Under the extant norms, in the event of the liquidation process continuing for more than 12 months, the liquidator shall hold a meeting of the contributories of the corporate person within 15 days from the end of the 12 months from the liquidation commencement date, and at the end every succeeding 12 months till the dissolution of the corporate person.
As per the amended norms, the liquidator shall hold a meeting of the contributories of the corporate person within 15 days –
- from the end of 270/90 days, as the case may be, and
- thereafter at the end of every succeeding 270/90 days, as the case may be
Further, the liquidator in its report shall also specify the reasons for not completing the process within the stipulated time period and the additional time required to complete the process.
Furthermore, the timeline for filing the status report by the liquidator has also been specified. Now, the liquidator shall file the Status Report with the Board within seven days of the meeting of contributories.
Intend behind the amendment
The amended norms establish a mechanism for specifying reasons for the delay and additional time needed to complete the liquidation process, promoting transparency and accountability in voluntary liquidations. This streamlines the process, reduces delays and promotes efficiency in corporate liquidations.
4. Amendment in Regulation 39; prescribes the detailed norms w.r.t claiming of amount deposited into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account by the stakeholders
As per Regulation 39 the liquidator shall deposit the amount of unclaimed dividends, if any, and undistributed proceeds, if any, in a liquidation process along with any income earned thereon till the date of deposit, into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account.
Under the extant norms1, if a stakeholder, who claims to be entitled to any amount deposited into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account, may apply to the Board in Form I for an order for withdrawal of the amount.
However, if any person other than the stakeholder claims to be entitled to any amount deposited to the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account, he shall submit evidence to satisfy the Board that he is so entitled.
Now, the board has specified the detailed framework in this respect by bifurcating the claim prior to dissolution and after dissolution. As per the amended norms following process is to be followed:
Claim prior to dissolution of the corporate person
Prior to dissolution of the corporate person, a stakeholder, who claims to be entitled to any amount deposited into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account, may apply to the liquidator in Form-I for withdrawal of the amount.
On receipt of request, the liquidator after verification of the claim, shall request the Board for release of amount to him for onward distribution.
Further, the Board on receipt of request may release the amount to the liquidator.
The liquidator shall, after making the distribution to the stakeholder shall intimate the Adjudicating Authority of such distribution.
Claim after dissolution of the corporate person
A stakeholder, who claims to be entitled to any amount deposited into the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account, may apply to the Board in Form-I for an order for withdrawal of the amount.
Intend behind the amendment
The Board has observed a substantial increase in withdrawal requests in cases where a final report has been submitted but the dissolution order has not been passed. The time gap between the issuance of the dissolution order and the submission of the application for dissolution is growing wider.
Further, based on data available with the Board the average time taken for the dissolution of the voluntary liquidation process from the date of submission of the final report is 280 days. This leads to delays in distribution and inconvenience to claimants.
Also, the extant norms do not provide for distribution after the final report but before the issuance of the dissolution order. Therefore, there is a need to provide for distribution to these claimants as it will help them get their dues and will reduce the correspondence being made to the Board.
5. Conclusion
IBBI’s recent amendments focus on three key aspects: enhanced disclosure requirements (Regulation 3), a revised timeline for contributories’ meetings (Regulation 37), and a streamlined process for claiming amounts from the Corporate Voluntary Liquidation Account (Regulation 39). These changes aim to boost transparency, reduce delays, and improve efficiency in the voluntary liquidation process.
- Regulation 39(7)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied