Alternative Remedy will not Operate as an Absolute Bar for Entertaining a Writ Petition: HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 3 May, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Ashiana Housing Ltd. v. Union of India - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 275 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- T.S. Sivagnanam & Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
- Pratyush Jhunjhunwala & S. Rudra, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Vipul Kundalia & Amit Sharma, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee filed a writ petition challenging the order under section 148A of the Income-tax Act. Single Judge opined that the said order is not itself an assessment or a demand. The assessee will have ample opportunity and scope in the proceedings after the issuance of notice to make out a case for dropping the proceedings under section 147. Thus, he dismissed the petition filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved by the dismissal, the assessee filed an intra-court appeal.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the legal principle which had been laid down by several decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court while interpreting the provision of the Act before its amendment would equally apply with full force while considering the correctness of an order passed under section 148A(d).
The court held that it would not be right to hold that all issues can be adjudicated at the time of the reassessment proceedings. When a jurisdictional issue is raised before the Court, even assuming an alternative remedy is available, it will not operate as an absolute bar for entertaining the writ petition as the jurisdictional issue goes to the root of the matter.
It is one of the exceptional factors carved out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court for the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the appeal stands admitted.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 138 taxmann.com 64/286 Taxman 183/444 ITR 1 (SC) (para 4).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
