Action Against Supplier is Essential for Non-reflection of Invoices Before Seeking Reversal from Recipient | Calcutta HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 5 August, 2023
Case Details: Suncraft Energy (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 81 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- T. S. Sivagnanam & Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
- Ankit Kanodia, Ms Megha Agarwal & Jitesh Sah, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Anirban Ray & Md. T.M. Siddiqui, S. Sanyal, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the department disallowed appellant’s input tax credit (ITC) after alleging non-reflection of supplier invoices in GSTR 2A for FY 2017-18. The appellant argued that it had made payment to supplier through valid tax invoice but the demand was confirmed. It file writ petition but the Court directed to file appeal before the Appellate Authority. Therefore, it filed intra Court appeal against the decision.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that Press Release dated 18-10-2018 clarifies GSTR-2A does not impact input tax credit of buyers. However, the reversal of credit from buyer shall also be an option available with the revenue authorities to address exceptional situations like missing dealer, closure of business by supplier or supplier not having adequate assets etc.
In the instant case, the appellant had already submitted invoices and showed that payments were made through bank to the suppliers. However, the department failed to inquire on supplier despite clarifications submitted by the appellant and directed appellant to reverse ITC.
The Court further noted that in such cases, action against supplier would be essential before seeking reversal from recipient. Therefore, it was held that the Revenue’s action was deemed to be arbitrary and the impugned order was liable to be set aside & demand raised on the appellant was not sustainable.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied