Acceptance of debt at a later date couldn’t change the date of default; plea u/s 9 was to be rejected
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 January, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: SLB Welfare Association v. PSA IMPEX (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 146 taxmann.com 93 (NCLAT-New Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, Dr Alok Srivastava & Barun Mitra, Technical Member
- Abhijeet Sinha, Shantanu Singh, Ravi Sehgal, Aditya Shukla & Ms Divya Narayanan, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Saurabh Jain, Abhishek Anand, Nipun Gautam, Pathik Chaudhury, Advs., Gaurav Mitra, CS, Gaurav Joshi, Atul Bhatia, Advs. & Prabhjot Ranjan Singh, RP for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the corporate debtor launched a housing project which was to be completed within a period of 36 months. Since, there was a delay in the completion of the project, homebuyers filed a complaint before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Thereafter, RERA by its order handed over the said project site to the appellant – SLB for completion of the remaining work. Meanwhile, the operational creditor filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) u/s 9 of the IBC demanding the due amount along with date of default as 31.03.2020.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed that application holding that it was hit by section 10A of the IBC. However, the operational creditor within a week from the withdrawal of application issued a notice u/s section 8 to the corporate debtor demanding unpaid operational debt and on basis of an alleged acknowledgement letter given by the corporate debtor dated 03.06.2021 filed an application u/s 9 of the IBC.
The NCLT by the impugned order admitted the said application. Thereafter, an appeal was made to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the order passed by the NCLT.
NCLAT Held
The NCLAT observed that when the date of default given by the operational creditor in the section 9 application was 31.03.2020, the mere fact that acknowledgement had been given by the corporate debtor on 03.06.2021 accepting debt, could not change the date of default.
The NCLAT held that date of acknowledgement and the date of default were two different events that were not dependent on the acknowledgement of debt. Hence, an application filed u/s 9 of the IBC was liable to be rejected being hit by section 10A and the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority was to be set aside.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Rudra Buildwell Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. PSA Impex (P.) Ltd. [2023] 146 taxmann.com 92 (NCLT – New Delhi)
- Rudra Buildwell Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. PSA Impex (P.) Ltd. [2023] 146 taxmann.com 91 (NCLT – New Delhi) (para 21) reserved [See Annex].
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
