AA Rightly Rejected Appellant’s Claim Before RP for Consultancy Services As He Couldn’t Substantiate Claims | NCLAT

  • News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 28 February, 2024

Consultancy Services

Case Details: Umesh Kumar v. Narendra Kumar Sharma, Insolvency Resolution Professional of Indirapuram Habitat Centre (P.) Ltd. - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 707 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, Barun Mitra & Arun Baroka, Technical Member
    • Ms Nattasha GargThakur Ankit SinghSrikant SinghMs Shristy Singh, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Sumesh DhawanPraful JindalShaurya Shyam, Advs. & N.K. Sharma for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant (i.e. operational creditor) claimed that he was hired as a media management consultant on a monthly retainer ship of Rs.10 lakhs per month for which purpose, the appellant had entered into a Consultancy Agreement with the corporate debtor.

After the corporate debtor was admitted into insolvency, the Resolution Professional (RP) invited claims, in which the appellant filed its claims vide e-mail dated 28.03.2020. However, the same was rejected by RP. Thereafter, the appellant filed an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking direction to RP to admit its claim.

The NCLT vide the impugned order rejected the said application on the ground that the appellant failed to show any document to substantiate the plea of rendering services by the appellant to the corporate debtor. Thus, there was no infirmity in the conclusion drawn by RP that he could not find any media service rendered by the appellant during the period for which consultancy fees were claimed.

Aggrieved by the NCLT’s order, the appellant filed an instant appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

It was noted that an e-mail was sent to RP enclosing the GST invoice for consultancy till August 2019 and in the said tax invoice service Description” column of the invoice, only the words “Management Consultancy” were stated without giving any further details.

It was further noted that RP had made it clear that due to want of documents in support of their claims, RP was unable to verify the claims of the appellant whenever, the appellant failed to comply with the persistent request of RP for documents.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that there was no incidence of wilful negligence, or deliberate stone-walling of claims on the part of RP in dealing with the appellant’s claim. Further, where RP had been consistently pointing out that he was not in a position to verify claims due to want of documents substantiating claims, the impugned order passed by the NCLT rejecting the application of the appellant seeking acceptance of their claims which had been rejected by RP, didn’t suffer from any infirmities.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied