AA Rightly Admitted CIRP Plea on Basis of CD’s Balance Sheet Showing Loan Facility Availed from Financial Creditor | SC
- News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 December, 2023
Case Details: Vipin Sharma v. Kaliber Associates (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 686 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala & Manoj Misra, JJ.
- Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv., Vikas Mishra, Adv., Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR, Ms Aditi Sharma, Sanchit Gawri & Raghav Agrawal, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Adv., Vikas Mishra & Sanchit Gawri, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Anirban Bhattacharya, Rajeev Chowdhary, Vinod K. Chaurasia & Shivam Pal, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the Financial Creditor filed an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Consequently, the said application was admitted by the NCLT on the ground that balance sheet of corporate debtor showed that corporate debtor had availed loan facility from financial creditor and there was a financial debt and default.
The Appellant being shareholder and suspended director of corporate debtor aggrieved by NCLT’s order had filed an appeal before NCLAT on the ground that as per MoU, signed between parties, amount advanced by Financial Creditor was only as an investment in corporate debtor and was not a financial debt.
The NCLAT by impugned order held that balance sheet of Corporate Debtor acknowledged loan advanced to Corporate Debtor. Additionally, it was concluded that the financial statement accompanying the section 7 application by the financial creditor explicitly displayed the short-term loan and advance under the Corporate Debtor’s name.
Consequently, the NCLAT found no fault in the NCLT’s order admitting the Section 7 application. Later, the appellant filed instant appeal before Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Held
The Supreme Court held that no error was found in impugned order passed by NCLAT and, therefore, instant appeal was to be dismissed.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Vipin Sharma v. Kaliber Associates (P.) Ltd. [2023] 156 taxmann.com 685 (NCLAT – New Delhi) (para 1) affirmed [See Annex].
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied