AA Erred in Rejecting Section 9 Plea Where Undisputed Overdues to Creditor Were Admitted by Corporate Debtor | NCLAT

  • News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 25 October, 2023

Section 9 Plea

Case Details: Clicbrics Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. Ansal Housing Ltd. - [2023] 155 taxmann.com 76 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson & Barun Mitra, Technical Member
    • Vinod Kr. Chaurasia, Adv. for the Appellant.
    • Vikas TiwariKumar Deepraj, Advs. & Anchit, AR for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, an MoU was entered into by the corporate debtor appointing the appellant/operational creditor as an agent for brokering the sale/purchase of units of the project of the corporate debtor.

Since, the corporate debtor stopped making payments for invoices for brokering commission raised by the appellant, it sent a demand notice to the corporate debtor. Subsequently, the appellant filed a section 9 application before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT).

The NCLT held that the appellant had approached with a mala fide intention having refused cheque payments issued by the corporate debtor and dismissed the said application vide the impugned order.

It was noted that the corporate debtor had admitted outstanding liability before the NCLT in its written submissions and the same was also substantiated from two cheques which were drawn in favour of the appellant by the corporate debtor subsequent to demand notice.

The NCLAT observed that since the operational debt which had admittedly become due and payable had not been disputed prior to the issuance of the demand notice and had not been discharged by the corporate debtor, the instant was a fit case for the admission of the CIRP.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that the NCLT had erroneously rejected an application filed under section 9 and the impugned order was to be set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied